Modern XMPP project discussion - 2024-09-27

  1. fugata

    That said, won't that need an encrypted public MUC to be non-anonymous? i.e. doesn't encryption need each send to know the participants' JIDs? ✎

  2. fugata

    That said, won't that need an encrypted public MUC to be non-anonymous? i.e. doesn't encryption need each send to know the recipients' JIDs? ✏

  3. fugata

    That said, won't that need an encrypted public MUC to be non-anonymous? i.e. doesn't encryption need each sender to know the recipients' JIDs? ✏

  4. Zash

    You don't need JIDs, you need some sort of key-stuffs

  5. pep.

    Also MEP. Someday. So the MUC doesn't even have to translate anything

  6. fugata

    pep.: MEP?

  7. pep.

    0316

  8. pep.

    That would allow people to "upload" their keys on the MUC itself, so that other participants don't have to go fetch it themselves on other people's accounts. Also possibly different identities per MUC

  9. fugata

    Oh, nice. That was being discussed in the Prav Loomio but nobody mentioned the XEP. ✎

  10. fugata

    Oh, nice. That was being discussed in the Prav Loomio but nobody mentioned the XEP, so I had no idea one existed. ✏