Modern XMPP project discussion - 2024-06-28


  1. epi

    > Snikket is explicitly not for team chat, that statement is on our website πŸ™‚ Hmm

  2. epi

    Looked for mentions of β€œteam” on Snikket's website, but couldn't find any.

  3. epi

    Prolly searching for the wrong thing, would be interested in understanding both the intentional limitation and the background

  4. Kris

    There is currently no good slack like client for xmpp, which is what is commonly understood as "team chat" these days.

  5. Kris

    That's really all there is to it.

  6. epi

    Ok, fair enough πŸ‘

  7. MattJ

    epi, https://snikket.org/about/goals/

  8. rom1dep

    > There is currently no good slack like client for xmpp, which is what is commonly understood as "team chat" these days. being slack-like is open for interpretation of course, but I'd challenge that gajim isn't a better slack than slack for "large number of large rooms" types of use-cases, and to an extent, movim is decent for that as well.

  9. Kris

    Movim has issues running on Prosody, and Gajim only very recently got to this point, but lacks a/v calls and arguable it isn't slack like if it isn't a web-client.

  10. Link Mauve

    Kris, I’ve only used Movim against Prosody, what are your issues?

  11. Kris

    It runs in degraded mode with half of the features disabled

  12. MattJ

    I haven't heard anyone complain about problems with Movim for a long time, and I know many people use it with Prosody and Snikket

  13. Kris

    And even if you configure the pubsub part better, it misses important permissions for public blogs.

  14. MattJ

    Lots of JMP customers for example, because it's a handy way to get cross-platform calls

  15. Kris

    I think people just stopped complaining πŸ˜…

  16. MattJ

    I wish πŸ˜‚

  17. rom1dep

    > lacks a/v calls I doubt this characterizes Slack and its main usage > it isn't slack like if it isn't a web-client. I don't see why that matters

  18. Kris

    Microsoft teams definitely is to a large part a video conference client.

  19. Kris

    Web-client matters a lot for on boarding of larger teams.

  20. Kris

    Impossible to get them all to install a native client, either because they use macos or their company laptops don't allow installing software.

  21. rom1dep

    Funny how nobody is using teams by the millions

  22. Kris

    MattJ: movim is really not used much at all, I think the lack of complaints is more a reflection of the lack of users than a lack of problems with prosody.

  23. Kris

    rom1dep: wdym? Its used *a lot*

  24. rom1dep

    I mean it's installed as a "native" app on millions of company laptops

  25. rom1dep

    Meaning to say that I don't see why it would be a showstopper for gajim and not teams, or slack native client, or

  26. Kris

    Yes and that points to the exact issue I mentioned above.

  27. Kris

    No Marcos version of gajim and you can't install gajim on many company windows laptops.

  28. Kris

    No MacOS version of gajim and you can't install gajim on many company windows laptops.

  29. Kris

    Teams comes *pre* installed

  30. rom1dep

    Doesn't Gtk run on Mac? How is teams preinstalled there ??

  31. Kris

    Teams runs in the browser

  32. Kris

    It might be possible to make a Mac version of gajim, but currently it does not exist and the devs show no interest in creating one.

  33. edhelas

    > I think people just stopped complaining πŸ˜… I cannot complain

  34. rom1dep

    > Teams runs in the browser But the vast majority use it installed 🀷

  35. edhelas

    Which is basically a Chrome wrapped :p

  36. Kris

    On windows, yes

  37. cal0pteryx

    > It might be possible to make a Mac version of gajim, but currently it does not exist and the devs show no interest in creating one. There simply is nobody capable of doing it. We're certainly interested