Modern XMPP project discussion - 2025-05-14

Question: maybe the "Terminology" page on the website can include "Criticism & Answers" section?

For example?

"Why XMPP doesn't have Spaces yet?"

No, why is "spaces" a terrible term for that, and why "collections" is much better.

pjoter, Kris: Prāv has a private group used for testing OMEMO issues. It has 120 participants and is a regular PITA for readers and writers alike 😅

Yes, because of key exchange issues, no?

Yes.

But it isn't an performance issue like the person was asking about.

> <fugata> > pjoter, Kris: Prāv has a private group used for testing OMEMO issues. It has 120 participants and is a regular PITA for readers and writers alike 😅 could you give me a contact to him? in pm ✏ ↺

pjoter: Prāv is a project, not a person 😅 https://prav.app/

> But it isn't an performance issue like the person was asking about. Ah...I think there's often a lot of delay in sending messages too. ↺

Hmm, maybe low powered mobile devices struggle with encrypting messsges 120 times?

120 people how many sessions per person

it baloons very quickly

would be interesting to see an MLS and pgp comparison to that

> <fugata> >>But it isn't an performance issue like the person was asking about. > Ah...I think there's often a lot of delay in sending messages too. is there a way to join this group? ↺

> pjoter: Prāv is a project, not a person 😅 > https://prav.app/ I find the aasumption that it must be a male even funnier. 🙂

>> pjoter: Prāv is a project, not a person 😅 >> https://prav.app/ > I find the aasumption that it must be a male even funnier. 🙂 👍 ↺

or maybe idk lets make a new one