-
MattJ
Yes, private are private and can't be joined/discovered except by invitation. What's missing in the Snikket apps is a way to make a channel that appears in the list but isn't just open to the public.
-
curiouser
> Yes, private are private and can't be joined/discovered except by invitation. What's missing in the Snikket apps is a way to make a channel that appears in the list but isn't just open to the public. So browse space only lists world public channels? ↺
-
The
E
-
Kris
The problem with this approach is that you can't send space invites to multiple channels, which is the main advantage of Discord servers.
-
Kris
That is onboarding and admin mabagement of channel groups.✎ -
Kris
That is onboarding and admin management of channel groups. ✏
-
stratself
>> Yes, private are private and can't be joined/discovered except by invitation. What's missing in the Snikket apps is a way to make a channel that appears in the list but isn't just open to the public. > So browse space only lists world public channels? yes, the MUC has to be configured to publish itself on the room directory ↺
-
stratself
btw is there a good place to chat about the upcoming SFU calls to be developed with Muji + Galene?
-
stratself
my main question is that would something E2EE be feasible in the future? I'm aware Galene isnt E2EE right now, which seems to be subpar to the alternative (MatrixRTC)
-
MattJ
I don't think E2EE was that hard to add to Jitsi's SFU (easy for me to say, as I did none of the work 😅) but my understanding is that the harder part for them was browser support
-
stratself
I mean, Discord probably has DAVE for their calls, and Element Call/MatrixRTC implement it as their own widget. So I guess the challenge is to write a somewhat standard XMPP client for this particular scenario
-
stratself
so an XDC plugin I suppose?
-
MattJ
I expect most clients would just support it natively
-
stratself
I can see the potential. much harder to do (and coordinate) when xmpp clients isn't simply built as webapps, though