-
L29Ah
how about <marquee>
-
alexkurisu
Anyway, Markdown-like markup which cannot be reliably separated from the text itself isn't good
-
alexkurisu
Like, document markup and structuring is the whole idea behind XML
-
stokito2
> alexkurisu wrote: > Why would you migrate away from XHTML-IM? It's awesome. I wish it was extended to support `<audio>` and `<video>` I personally don't like the duplication of the formatted and raw body. This not only increase a packet size but also makes performance worse. But the main reason is that this is simply a duplicataion of the MessageStyling/ Markdown that already in the the message body itself (and will always have). My proposition is to extend the MessageStyle to a full Markdown and let the MD parser to work on sanitization ↺
-
stokito2
> alexkurisu wrote: > Anyway, Markdown-like markup which cannot be reliably separated from the text itself isn't good Is there a reason to separate them? If you need it, render and copy the rendered text. The MD is readable so it's fine to show it even in raw. ↺