Modern XMPP project discussion - 2024-11-23


  1. leke

    Can anyone tell me who operates https://providers.xmpp.net/ and how reliable is the information on this website?

  2. MattJ

    leke: some of the information is gathered automatically, some is manually gathered (and may get outdated occasionally). As far as reliability, I think you can generally trust the facts presented there.

  3. MattJ

    What's not ideal is the way the servers are rated and ranked

    👍 1
  4. MattJ

    Those rankings are primarily aimed at client developers, not users

  5. MattJ

    And it doesn't take everything into account. So some servers are at the top of the list which I would recommend, and some good reputable servers receive a terrible rating

  6. MattJ

    And it doesn't take everything into account. So some servers are at the top of the list which I would never recommend, and some good reputable servers receive a terrible rating

  7. opinionplatform.org

    leke: I can tell you from experience, an A rated provider was blocked by another service (and their mucs), because of reputation, for not responding to claims of abuse. I saw no evidence of this abuse, but wasted time finding out the cause of failures to join mucs. These things are not found in the ratings.

  8. mod

    Thanks

  9. mod

    > leke: I can tell you from experience, an A rated provider was blocked by another service (and their mucs), because of reputation, for not responding to claims of abuse. I saw no evidence of this abuse, but wasted time finding out the cause of failures to join mucs. > > These things are not found in the ratings. I have encountered this problem before, and I think I finally know the answer now

  10. Kris

    > What's not ideal is the way the servers are rated and ranked 👍