-
leke
Can anyone tell me who operates https://providers.xmpp.net/ and how reliable is the information on this website?
-
MattJ
leke: some of the information is gathered automatically, some is manually gathered (and may get outdated occasionally). As far as reliability, I think you can generally trust the facts presented there.
-
MattJ
What's not ideal is the way the servers are rated and ranked
👍 1 -
MattJ
Those rankings are primarily aimed at client developers, not users
-
MattJ
And it doesn't take everything into account. So some servers are at the top of the list which I would recommend, and some good reputable servers receive a terrible rating✎ -
MattJ
And it doesn't take everything into account. So some servers are at the top of the list which I would never recommend, and some good reputable servers receive a terrible rating ✏
-
opinionplatform.org
leke: I can tell you from experience, an A rated provider was blocked by another service (and their mucs), because of reputation, for not responding to claims of abuse. I saw no evidence of this abuse, but wasted time finding out the cause of failures to join mucs. These things are not found in the ratings.
-
mod
Thanks
-
mod
> leke: I can tell you from experience, an A rated provider was blocked by another service (and their mucs), because of reputation, for not responding to claims of abuse. I saw no evidence of this abuse, but wasted time finding out the cause of failures to join mucs. > > These things are not found in the ratings. I have encountered this problem before, and I think I finally know the answer now ↺
-
Kris
> What's not ideal is the way the servers are rated and ranked 👍 ↺