-
jonas’
s/joinxmpp/joinsnikket/? :-O
-
pep.
might be at some point, who knows :)
-
pep.
I don't know if that's a goal for snikket though
-
Ge0rG
Maybe rather joinmysnikket?
-
MattJ
I personally don't believe in public servers as a sustainable model for the network (bootstrapping it, maybe)
-
MattJ
But can't rule out a joinsnikket or something
-
emus
MattJ: I believe in you have the choice (and that must be a valid thing to have a choice)
-
emus
Few people can maintain it theirselves or have an interest to do so
-
Daniel
The opposite of public isn't necessarily self hosted
-
MattJ
The point of Snikket isn't that everyone runs it themselves, it's that someone you know/trust runs it
-
MattJ
Few public servers are transparent about who runs them, why, how well maintained they are (backups? security?) and when they will shut down and make your account useless
-
emus
> The opposite of public isn't necessarily self hosted Thats right, still, if you let host for yourself, you have the same problem. Even more, from a public hoster and how they apprear to the outside you can read a lot how much they care. Of course, you can fake it, but how someone writes their believes about data and ToS is a statement I think. And finally, in a close thing you still can be "bootstrapped"
-
emus
Most crimes happens within the family, right?
-
emus
> Thats right, still, if you let host for yourself on a closed server, you have the same problem. Even more, from a public hoster and how they apprear to the outside you can read a lot how much they care. Of course, you can fake it, but how someone writes their believes about data and ToS is a statement I think. And finally, in a close thing you still can be "bootstrapped" > Most crimes happens within the family, right?
-
emus
ups✎ -
emus
ups. ✏
-
emus
I wanted to correct the text, not qutote^^
-
jonas’
ah yeah, I’ve read that as a concern quite often already
-
Link Mauve
MattJ, all things you mention are part of the goals of CHATONS, btw.
-
Link Mauve
It’s not specific to XMPP, but many of them are running XMPP services, and we’re trying to encourage the other ones to do that too.
-
Ge0rG
Link Mauve: what's that?
-
Link Mauve
Ge0rG, an initiative from Framasoft to help decentralise and federate hosters of various services around a common set of rules.
-
Link Mauve
https://chatons.org/en
-
Ge0rG
That's great! Also sounds like *IM* might be interested in a German faction.
-
Ge0rG
So Modern xmpp is a technical thing, CHATONS a political one, and snikket is somewhere in the middle?
-
Link Mauve
Rules and values, obviously.
-
Link Mauve
In a traditional anarchist way. :)
-
MattJ
Maybe someone should map all these out somewhere :)
-
MattJ
Snikket is loosely "applied Modern XMPP"
-
Ge0rG
Maybe we need to consolidate instead of mapping out?
-
Zash
That's not how humans behave
-
MattJ
Well it doesn't make sense to consolidate a cross-project documentation project with a specific implementation
-
Zash
To me, "consolidate" just sounds like "give up"
-
Ge0rG
Zash: is "unify" better?
-
Zash
No, I'm too grumpy.
-
MattJ
Another reason not to run a public server in 2020+: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/03/graham-blumenthal-bill-new-path-doj-finally-break-encryption
-
emus
MattJ: Sounds like making even more public outside from US
-
MattJ
Other countries will follow
-
MattJ
Guaranteed
-
emus
MattJ: I can imagine, but that issue is not about public servers only I think
-
MattJ
It means the server operator would be legally responsible for all content going through their server
-
MattJ
Which makes it very unlikely you would ever want to run a server with open registration
-
Daniel
It just means that the list of countries I can't travel to gets longer
-
emus
^^ How long is it already?
-
emus
> Which makes it very unlikely you would ever want to run a server with open registration Dont we have that particular situation already? And still people run TOR relays?
-
Zash
Varies with juristiction
-
emus
Zash: But basically they make you alreafy responsible or? EU should go for a new way "digital freedom" turn back their legislations and sueveillance from the recent years (except privacy). Maybe US people start going "back" 😊 And put the money to educational purposes. Win win✎ -
emus
Zash: But basically they make you already responsible or? EU should go for a new way "digital freedom" turn back their legislations and sueveillance from the recent years (except privacy). Maybe US people start going "back" 😊 And put the money to educational purposes. Win win ✏
-
Zash
Going in that direction yes, last I heard
-
Zash
How does law enforcement and media companies profit from that?
-
Ge0rG
And this is why Germany is working on a new law that will require online services to report user passwords to the police
-
Zash
dafuq
-
Zash
We got some law about letting law enforcement secretly get into your encrypted devices coming into effect april 1st. Secret data reading something sometthing.
-
Zash
Much fun.
-
Ge0rG
In Germany we got that some years ago and the activists tagged it the "federal Trojan"
-
Ge0rG
And possession of hacker tools is also forbidden
-
Zash
HACKER TOOLS
-
Zash
sunglases and hoodies?
-
Ge0rG
And stickers that can be put on laptops
-
emus
> And stickers that can be put on laptops Cruel basterds!
-
emus
If they would put their money into IT competence, they wouldn`t fear hackers living on their bankrupt software structure
-
emus
Anyway, offtopic 👋